🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations frequently spent years building community backing and pushing their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics however have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to create other types of electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their seats.