🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."